Training Path and Achievement of Professional Competencies through ePortfolio at the ADS

Authors

  • Miguel Antonio Roco Ibaceta Universidad de Concepción
  • Elena Barberà Gregori Universidad Oberta de Catalunya,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4151/07189729-Vol.64-Iss.3-Art.1566

Keywords:

Higher education learning process active learning information and communication technologies classroom arrangement

Abstract

The integration of technology into teaching and learning has become central in contemporary educational practice, emphasizing the interactive relationship between pedagogy and technology. Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) are acknowledged as cultural and cognitive mediators capable of transforming the educational landscape and influencing the quality of learning processes depending on how they are employed (Greener, 2018; Wang & Wegerif, 2019). In higher education, institutions have adopted ICT as a strategic resource to enhance and diversify learning opportunities, expand academic offerings, and promote student-centered approaches (Cabero et al., 2011). This transformation is also connected to the increasing availability of Open Educational Resources (OER), which provide free online access to learning materials, fostering collaborative and self-directed learning (Aparicio & Ostos, 2021).

From a pedagogical perspective, these technological advancements have triggered a shift towards personalized, continuous, and lifelong learning experiences that cultivate critical, independent, and creative thinking (Kim et al., 2020; Zhang & Li, 2017). Moreover, the adoption of ICT stimulates the implementation of innovative teaching methodologies, improving educational quality and enabling significant transformations across educational systems (Prieto et al., 2017). To understand these transformations, it becomes essential to gather evidence that captures how students reflect on, collaborate in, and self-regulate their learning processes, thus revealing their evolving professional competences (Blanch et al., 2009). The study of formative pathways contributes to understanding the complexity and diversity of professional development processes, shedding light on the individual and contextual conditions that shape them (Attwell, 2008).

Building upon these theoretical premises, this research explores the relationship between the training trajectory (TA), the implementation of ICT, and the achievement of professional competences (CP) within the context of the Architectural Design Studio (ADS) in a Chilean Architecture program. The study aims to analyze the learning evidence contained in students’ ePortfolios, which serve as key tools for assessing both the relevance of the training process and the attained levels of professional competence. Employing a descriptive methodology with a quantitative approach, data were collected from 14 academic semesters between 2012 and 2018. The analysis revealed patterns in learning trajectories that indicate varying levels of performance and competence achievement, influenced by the degree of ICT integration within the learning environment.

The findings suggest that students follow diverse and partially overlapping learning paths, shaped by individual and collaborative learning agendas. These trajectories reflect differentiated processes of professional identity formation and highlight the importance of sustained technological mediation in supporting meaningful learning experiences. Furthermore, the results underscore the potential of ePortfolios as reflective and assessment tools that not only document learning outcomes but also foster metacognitive awareness and self-regulation throughout the curriculum. In conclusion, the study reaffirms the transformative role of ICT as an enabler of innovation and equity in higher education, offering new pathways to optimize competence-based training and promote continuous professional growth.

References

Agencia Nacional de Evaluación de la Calidad y Acreditación. (2013). Guía de apoyo para la redacción, puesta en práctica y evaluación de los Resultados de Aprendizaje. ANECA. http://www.aneca.es/Documentos-y-publicaciones/Otras-guias-y-documentos-de-evaluacion/Guia-de-apoyo-para-la-redaccion-puesta-en-practica-y-evaluacion-de-los-RESULTADOS-DEL-APRENDIZAJE

Anderson, T. (2016). Theories for Learning with Emerging Technologies. En G. Valetsianos (Ed.), Emergence and Innovation in Digital Learning: Foundations and Applications (pp. 23-39). Athabasca University Press. https://doi.org/10.15215/aupress/9781897425763.01

Aneas, A., Rubio, M. J., & Vilà, R. (2018). Digital portfolios and assessment of transversal competencies in internships of the Bachelor’s Degree in Pedagogy at the University of Barcelona. Educar, 54(2), 283-301. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/educar.878

Aparicio, O., & Ostos, O. (2021). Pedagogías emergentes en ambientes virtuales de aprendizaje. Revista Internacional de Pedagogía e Innovación Educativa, 1(1), 11-36. https://doi.org/10.51660/ripie.v1i1.25

Attwell, G. (2008). Personal Learning Environments: The future of education? [Presentación de PowerPoint]. SlideShare. https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/personal-learning-enviroments-the-future-of-education-presentation/961496

Barberà, E., Mauri, T., & Onrubia, J. (2008). Cómo valorar la calidad de la enseñanza basada en las TIC. GRAÓ.

Barberá, E., Quintana, J., Galván, C., & Illera, J. L. R. (2016). The e-portfolio as a facilitator of a diversified and reflective information competence. BiD, 36. https://doi.org/10.1344/BiD2016.36.7

Blanch, S. S., Fuentes, M., Gimeno, X., González, N., Rifà, M., Santiveri, N., Gelabert, S. B., Rifa, M., & Santiveri, N. (2009). Relaciones entre aprendizaje, cognición y tecnologías en la construcción del e-portafolio. RED. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 8(8), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(81)90450-8

Buchanan, P. (2012). The Big Rethink: Rethinking Architectural Education. Architectural Review. 232(1388), 91-101.https://www.architectural-review.com

Burgos, C. E. (2015). La naturaleza cognitiva del proyecto y la crisis en la concepción heredada en la enseñanza de la arquitectura. Arquitecturas Del Sur, 33(48), 44-55.

Cabero, J., Llorente, M. del C., Puentes, Á., Marín, V., & Cruz, I. (2011). Las competencias digitales del profesorado: un estudio en la Pontificia Universidad Católica Madre y Maestra. Universidad de Sevilla. Grupo de investigación didáctica.

Coll, C. (2016). La personalización del aprendizaje escolar: El qué, el por qué y el cómo de un reto insoslayable. Research Gate, 2015, 1-36.

Coll, C., Mauri, T., & Onrubia, J. (2008). La utilización de las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación en la educación: del diseño tecno-pedagógico a las prácticas de uso. En C. Coll, & C. Monereo (Eds.), Psicología de la educación virtual (pp. 74-103). Morata.

Coll, C., Mauri, T., & Rochera, M. J. (2012). Las Practicas De Evaluación Como Contexto De Aprender a Aprender a Ser Un Aprendiz Competente. Revista de Currículum y Formación de Profesorado, 16, 49-59. http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/567/56724377004.pdf

Cu, D., Gómez, Y., Maciel, R., & Ramírez, M. (2019). El Portafolio de evidencias, una estrategia de enseñanza. Revista Electrónica Multidisciplinaria de Investigación y Docencia, 16, 73-95. https://revistaic.instcamp.edu.mx/uploads/Ano2019No16/Ano2019No16-73-95.pdf

Demirbas, O., & Demirkan, H. (2007). Learning styles of design students and the relationship of academic performance and gender in design education. Learning and Instruction, 17(3), 345-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.02.007

Díaz-Barriga, F., Alatorre-Rico, J., & Castañeda-Solís, F. (2022). Trayectorias interrumpidas: motivos de estudiantes universitarios para suspender temporalmente sus estudios durante la pandemia. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación Superior, XIII, 3-25. https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.20072872e.2022.36.1181

Díaz-Barriga, F., López-Ramírez, J. L., & López-Banda, E. A. (2020). Personal learning trajectories and flexible curriculum: The university psychology students’ perspective. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación Superior, 11(30), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.20072872e.2020.30.585

European Commission. (2012). Using Learning Outcomes. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2766/17497

García Sánchez, M. del R., Reyes Añorve, J., & Godínez Alarcón, G. (2018). Las Tic en la Educación Superior, Innovaciones y Retos. RICSH Revista Iberoamericana de Las Ciencias Sociales y Humanísticas, 6(12), 299-316. https://doi.org/10.23913/ricsh.v6i12.135

Greener, S. (2018). The knowing-doing gap in learning with technology. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(7), 856-857. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1510155

Ioannou, O. (2018). Opening up design studio education using blended and networked formats. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15, Artículo 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0129-7

Kennedy, D. D. (2008). Redactar y Utilizar Resultados de Aprendizaje. University College Cork.

Kim, D., Lee, Y., Leite, W. L., & Huggins-Manley, A. C. (2020). Exploring student and teacher usage patterns associated with student attrition in an open educational resource-supported online learning platform. Computers and Education, 156, Artículo 103961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103961

Kurt, S. (2009). An analytic study on the traditional studio environments and the use of the constructivist studio in the architectural design education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 401-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.072

Masdéu, M., & Fuses, J. (2017). Reconceptualizing the Design Studio in Architectural Education: Distance Learning and Blended Learning as Transformation Factors. ArchNet-IJAR, 11(2), 6-23. https://doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v11i2.1156

Montagud, N. (2021, 23 de julio). Evidencias del aprendizaje: Qué son, tipos y características. Psicología y Mente. https://psicologiaymente.com/desarrollo/evidencias-aprendizaje

Pasin, B. (2017). Rethinking the Design Studio-Centered Architectural Education. A Case Study at Schools of Architecture in Turkey. The Design Journal, 20(sup1), 1270-1284. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352656

Prieto, M. E., Pech, S. J., & Zapata, A. (2017). Tecnología y Aprendizaje: Avances en el Mundo Académico Hispano. Comunidad Internacional para el Avance de la Tecnología en el Aprendizaje, CIATA.

Roberts, A. (2012). Recording and Reflecting on Workplace Experience. CEBE Briefing Guide Series, 13, 1-11.

Roco, M., & Barberà, E. (2020a). Criteria for the definition of indicators in architectural learning in the design studio through the use of the E-portfolio. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 44(1), 52-62. https://doi.org/10.3846/jau.2020.11159

Roco, M., & Barberà, E. (2020b). Integrating E-Portfolio Strategy in the Architectural Design Studio. Design Journal, 23(4), 575-595. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2020.1769974

Roco, M., & Barberà, E. (2022). ePortfolio to promote networked learning: an experience in the Latin American context. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19, Artículo 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00336-8

Rodríguez, E., Rodríguez, J., Fernández, F., & Martínez, A. (2018). Guía rápida sobre resultados de aprendizaje. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. https://eprints.ucm.es/58707/1/GUIA_RAPIDA_RESULTADOS_DE_APRENDIZAJE.pd

Schön, D. A. (1992). La formación de profesionales reflexivos: Hacia un nuevo diseño de la enseñanza y el aprendizaje en las profesiones. Paidós.

Shulman, L. S. (2005). Conocimiento y enseñanza: fundamentos de la nueva reforma. Profesorado: Revista de currículum y formación del profesorado, 9(2), 1-30. https://www.ugr.es/~recfpro/rev92ART1.pdf

Tamir, P. (2005). Conocimiento profesional y personal de los profesores y de los formadores de profesores. Profesorado. Revista de currículum y formación del profesorado. 9(2), 263-268. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/567/56790204.pdf

Tardif, M. (2013). El oficio docente en la actualidad. Perspectivas internacionales y desafíos a futuro. En M. Poggi (Ed.), Políticas Docentes. Formación, trabajo y desarrollo profesional (pp. 19-44). UNESCO.

Terigi, F. (2007). Los desafíos que plantean las trayectorias escolares. En III Foro Latinoamericano de Educación Jóvenes y Docentes. La Escuela Secundaria en el mundo de hoy (pp. 1-20). Fundación Santillana. https://www.sadlobos.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Terigi-Los-desafios-que-planean-las-trayectorias-escolares.pdf

Thibodeaux, T., Cummings, C., & Harapnuik, D. (2017). Factors that Contribute to ePortfolio Persistence. International Journal of EPortfolio, 7(1), 1-12. https://www.theijep.com/pdf/IJEP257.pdf

Tobón, S. (2013). Formación integral y competencias. Pensamiento complejo, currículo, didáctica y evaluación. ECOE.

Wang, M., & Wegerif, R. (2019). From active-in-behaviour to active-in-thinking in learning with technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2178-2180. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12874

Zhang, M., & Li, Y. (2017). Teaching experience on faculty members’ perceptions about the attributes of open educational resources (OER). International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 12(4), 191-199. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v12i04.6638

Published

2025-12-01

How to Cite

Roco Ibaceta, M. A., & Barberà Gregori, E. (2025). Training Path and Achievement of Professional Competencies through ePortfolio at the ADS. Perspectiva Educacional, 64(3), 324–352. https://doi.org/10.4151/07189729-Vol.64-Iss.3-Art.1566

Issue

Section

Research Articles