Being a Gifted Student at University: Significance, Challenges, and Opportunities from a Pioneering Experience in Chile
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4151/07189729-Vol.65-Iss.1-Art.1825Keywords:
intellectual giftedness inclusive education higher education university studentsAbstract
Educational attention to Intellectual Giftedness (IG) has historically been concentrated in childhood and adolescence, both in research and in the development of public policy. In contrast, their presence and needs in Higher Education have received limited attention, contributing to making this population invisible within the university context. This situation becomes particularly relevant when considering that a significant proportion of university students may present high abilities without having been identified or having received specific support throughout their educational trajectories. Moreover, in the Latin American context, and particularly in Chile, research on university students with IG remains scarce, as do institutional initiatives aimed at their recognition and support.
Within this context, the present study seeks to understand how university students with high abilities make meaning of their educational experiences and re-signify their identities through their participation in a pioneering support program implemented at a Chilean university. Specifically, the study explores three central dimensions: the re-signification of educational trajectories in light of the recognition of IG, the challenges these students face in their university experience, and the opportunities that emerge from the institutional recognition of their abilities.
To address this objective, a qualitative study with a phenomenological approach was conducted, aimed at understanding the meanings that students themselves attribute to their experiences. The sample consisted of 16 university students belonging to the Núcleo Program at the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso. Data were collected through individual in-depth interviews and a focus group, allowing for the exploration of both personal experiences and shared meanings among participants. Subsequently, the data were analyzed through thematic analysis.
The findings show that the university experience of students with IG is characterized by a combination of strengths and tensions. Among the strengths, participants highlight autonomous learning, intrinsic motivation for knowledge, and the ability to integrate and understand complex content with ease. However, several challenges associated with their educational experience also emerge, such as high levels of self-demand, lack of interest in learning perceived as insufficiently challenging, difficulties with academic discipline, and tensions in the construction of personal and academic identity. Likewise, several participants reported having felt different from their peers throughout their educational trajectories.
A relevant finding of the study is that the institutional recognition of high abilities, through participation in the university program, promotes processes of re-signifying educational trajectories and reconstructing identity. For many students, late identification allowed them to reinterpret previous experiences of mismatch, misunderstanding, or lack of challenge, providing new meaning through the understanding of their cognitive and socio-emotional characteristics. In addition, the program is valued as a space for meeting peers with similar interests, for educational enrichment, and for personal validation.
Overall, the findings highlight the need to advance toward university policies and practices that recognize the cognitive diversity of the student body and integrate support for students with high abilities within the frameworks of inclusive education.
References
Aguilera-García, J. L., & Macías-Gómez, M.ª E. (2025). La universidad ante los estudiantes con altas capacidades intelectuales. Anduli. Revista Andaluza de Ciencias Sociales, 27, 199-225. https://doi.org/10.12795/anduli.2025.i27.09
Alshehri, R. M. (2020). Gifted adults career as a reflection of gifted education: A systematic review of the literature. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 10(2), 38-45. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-1002063845
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/11735
Briscioli, B. (2017). Aportes para la construcción conceptual de las “trayectorias escolares” / Approaches towards building the concept of “school pathways”. Actualidades Investigativas en Educación, 17(3), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.15517/aie.v17i3.30212
Columbus Group. (1991). Unpublished transcript of the meeting of the Columbus Group. Columbus, OH.
Conejeros-Solar, M. L., Cáceres Serrano, P., & Oneto Zúñiga, P. (2011). La desatención educativa diferencial: Consecuencias socio-emocionales en adolescentes con altas capacidades. Fondo de Investigación y Desarrollo en Educación (FONIDE). https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12365/18214
Conejeros-Solar, M. L., Catalán, S., Gómez-Arizaga, M. P., López-Jiménez, T., Contador, N., Sandoval-Rodríguez, K., Bustamante, C., & Quijanes, J. (2024). A systematic review of conceptualizations, early indicators, and educational provisions for intellectual precocity. Journal of Intelligence, 12, Article 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence12080076
Consejo Superior de Expertos en Altas Capacidades. (2008). Altas capacidades. http://altascapacidadescse.org/Definiciones_Castellano.pdf
Covarrubias, P. (2018). Del concepto de aptitudes sobresalientes al de altas capacidades y el talento. IE Revista de Investigación Educativa de la REDIECH, 9(17), 53-67. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2448-85502018000200053
Cvetkovic-Vega, A., Maguiña, J., Soto, A., Lama-Valdivia, J., & López, L. (2021). Estudios transversales. Revista de la Facultad de Medicina Humana, 21(1), 179-185. https://doi.org/10.25176/rfmh.v21i1.3069
Gagné, F. (2015). De los genes del talento: La perspectiva DMGT/CMTD. Revista de Educación, 368, 12-39.
García, C., & Borquez, C. (2022). Altas capacidades intelectuales y metacognición en adultos. Revista Neuropsicología, Neuropsiquiatría y Neurociencias, 22(1), 1-19.
Hernández, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación (6.ª ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. https://www.esup.edu.pe/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/2.%20Hernandez,%20Fernandez%20y%20Baptista-Metodolog%C3%ADa%20Investigacion%20Cientifica%206ta%20ed.pdf
Higueras-Rodríguez, L. (2017). Intervención educativa en el alumnado con altas capacidades. Revista Ensayos Pedagógicos, 12(1), 69-81. https://doi.org/10.15359/rep.12-1.4
Infante-Rejano, E., Scurtu-Tura, M. C., Jiménez-Soto, A., & Santana, M. (2023). No name, no fame: A bibliometric analysis of publications of giftedness in adults. Anduli. Revista Andaluza de Ciencias Sociales, 24, 123-149. https://doi.org/10.12795/anduli.2023.i24.06
Ministerio de Educación de Chile. (s. f.). ¿Qué se entiende por trayectoria educativa? Educación de Personas Jóvenes y Adultas (EPJA). https://epja.mineduc.cl/que-se-entiende-por-trayectoria-educativa/
Ministerio de Educación de Chile. (2016). Orientaciones para la construcción de comunidades educativas inclusivas. https://media.mineduc.cl/wp-content/uploads/sites/28/2017/07/Orientaciones-Comunidades-Educativas-Inclusivas.pdf
Mosquera, J. J. M., Stobäus, C. D., & Freitas, S. N. (2013). Altas habilidades/superdotação: Abordagem ao longo da vida. Revista Educação Especial, 26(46), 401-420. https://periodicos.ufsm.br/educacaoespecial/article/view/5371
Ortiz, E., Mariño, M., González Pérez del Villar, A. M., & Pérez, F. (2013). La identificación y el desarrollo de estudiantes talentosos en la educación superior. Pedagogía Universitaria, 18(1), 3-18. https://acaaci.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/La-identificacion-y-el-desarrollo-de-alumnos-.pdf
Pérez, S. G. P. B. (2008). Ser ou não ser, eis a questão: O processo de construção da identidade na pessoa com altas habilidades/superdotação adulta (Tesis doctoral, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul). Repositorio institucional. https://repositorio.pucrs.br/dspace/handle/10923/2662
Peters, S. J., Matthews, M. S., McBee, M. T., & McCoach, D. B. (2020). Beyond gifted education: Designing and implementing advanced academic programs. Prufrock Press.
Pfeiffer, S. I. (2013). Serving the gifted: Evidence-based clinical and psychoeducational practice. Routledge.
Pfeiffer, S. I. (2015). Essentials of gifted assessment. Wiley.
Quílez, A., & Lozano, R. (2020). Modelos de inteligencia y altas capacidades: Una revisión descriptiva y comparativa. Enseñanza & Teaching, 38(1), 69-85. https://doi.org/10.14201/et20203816985
Raven, J. C., Court, J. H., & Raven, J. (2004). Test de matrices progresivas: Escalas coloreada, general y avanzada. Manual. Editorial Paidós.
Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60(3), 180-184.
Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (2021). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A change in direction from being gifted to the development of gifted behaviors. En R. J. Sternberg, & D. Ambrose (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness and talent (pp. 335-356). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56869-6
Rinn, A. N., & Bishop, J. (2015). Gifted adults: A systematic review and analysis of the literature. Gifted Child Quarterly, 59(4), 213-235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986215600795
Rodrigues de Souza, A., Rosselló, E., & Borges, A. (2023). Altas capacidades en adultos: Análisis del diagnóstico y de la respuesta educativa. Educação por Escrito, 14(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.15448/2179-8435.2023.e43300
Rodríguez-Naveiras, E., & Borges, A. (2019). Programas extraescolares: Una alternativa a la respuesta educativa de altas capacidades. Revista de Educación y Desarrollo, 52, 19-27. https://www.cucs.udg.mx/revistas/edu_desarrollo/anteriores/52/52_RodriguezBorges.pdf
Sastre-Riba, S., Fonseca-Pedrero, E., & Ortuño-Sierra, J. (2019). Desde la alta capacidad intelectual hacia el genio: Perfiles de perfeccionismo / From high intellectual ability to genius: Profiles of perfectionism. Comunicar, 60, 9-17. https://doi.org/10.3916/C60-2019-01
Sternberg, R. J. (2023). Individual, collective, and contextual aspects in the identification of giftedness. Gifted Education International, 40(1), 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294231156986
Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2012). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(2), 1-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612455677
Terigi, F. (2009). Las trayectorias escolares: Del problema individual al desafío de la política educativa. Ministerio de Educación de la Nación.
Tourón, J. (2000). Mitos y realidades en torno a la alta capacidad. En L. Almeida, E. P. Oliveira, & A. S. Melo (Eds.), Alunos sobredotados. Contributos para a sua identificação e apoio (pp. X-X). ANEIS. https://dadun.unav.edu/bitstream/10171/19979/1/Mitos%20y%20realidades%20en%20torno%20a%20la%20alta%20capacidad.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Valeria Paz Fuentes, Paloma

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors grant an exclusive licence, without time limit, for the manuscript to be published in the Perspectiva Educacional journal, published by the Pontificia Universidad Católica of Valparaíso (Chile), through the School of Pedagogy.